Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences ; (12): 443-453, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-887715

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the changes in the cytokine profiles of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients undergoing antiviral treatment.@*Methods@#Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients were treated with Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and entecavir (ETV). Clinical biochemistry and cytokines were detected at baseline and every 3 months.@*Results@#In all, 200 patients completed 48 weeks of treatment, 100 in the PEG-IFN group and 100 in the ETV group. During 3-6 months of treatment, compared with baseline, the PEG-IFN group showed a significant decrease in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-17A (IL-17A), interleukin-6(IL-6), interleukin-10(IL-10), and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) ( @*Conclusion@#During antiviral therapy, a change in the cytokine profile occurred; in the aspect of immune control and functional cure, PEG-IFN was significantly better than ETV.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytokines/blood , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use
2.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 34(3): 377-385, jul.-sep. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-902946

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivos Comparar en términos de costo-efectividad a entecavir (ETV) y tenofovir (TDF) en el tratamiento del virus de la hepatitis B (HBV) en hospitales públicos del Perú. Materiales y métodos Estructuramos un modelo de Markov, definimos la efectividad en años de vida ajustados a calidad (AVAC). Incluimos los costos directos del tratamiento en soles desde la perspectiva del Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Calculamos la relación entre costo y efectividad incrementales (ICER). Realizamos análisis de sensibilidad determinístico y probabilístico, considerando un rango de disponibilidad de pago (WTP) desde uno hasta tres veces el producto bruto interno (PBI) per-cápita, y el beneficio monetario neto (BMN) o ICER en el caso del análisis de tornado. Resultados El tratamiento con TDF es más efectivo y menos costoso que ETV. El ETV tuvo un costo por AVAC de S/ 4482, y de S/ 1526 para TDF. El TDF mantiene un BMN progresivamente mayor conforme aumenta la WTP. La tasa de descuento fue la única variable con efecto significativo en la incertidumbre del modelo. Conclusiones El tratamiento con TDF es más costo-efectivo que ETV en hospitales públicos del Perú.


ABSTRACT Objetives To compare in terms of cost-effectiveness to entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in public hospitals in Peru. Materials and methods We structured a Markov model. We define effectiveness adjusted life years for quality (QALY). We include the direct costs of treatment in soles from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Peru. We estimate the relationship between cost and effectiveness ratios (ICER). We performed sensitivity analyzes considering a range of willingness to pay (WTP) from one to three times the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, and a tornado analysis regarding Monetary Net Profit (BMN) or ICER. Results Treatment with TDF is more effective and less expensive than ETV. The ETV had a cost per QALY of PEN 4482, and PEN 1526 TDF. The PTO maintains a progressively larger with increasing WTP BMN. The discount rate was the only variable with a significant effect on model uncertainty. Conclusion Treatment with TDF is more cost-effective than ETV in public hospitals in Peru.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Antiviral Agents/economics , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/economics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Tenofovir/economics , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Peru , Markov Chains , Guanine/economics , Guanine/therapeutic use
3.
Ann. hepatol ; 16(2): 207-214, Mar.-Apr. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-887224

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background. Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) are often treated with nucleoside/nucleotide antiviral agents and metabolic bone toxicity is a possible concern. Objective. To determine the relationships between fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a phosphaturic hormone, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone biochemical abnormalities in these patients. Material and methods. This is a cross-sectional observational study comparing HBV-infected subjects treated for at least one year with tenofovir (TDF), lamuvidine (LVD), entacavir (ETV), or not treated (CON). Patients with abnormalities in either calcium (Ca), phosphate (PO4), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) or FGF23 were further evaluated with BMD by DXA. Results. No difference in liver enzymes or renal function seen among groups, but hypophosphatemia was seen in all groups with the highest incidence with TDF treatment (14%). FGF 23 levels were found to be elevated in 11.1% of TDF patients, 2.77% amongst controls. No elevations were found in the LVD or ETV groups. Among a subset of subjects (FGF23, PO4, and/or Ca abnormalities) who underwent further evaluation, 67% had insufficient 25-OH vitamin D, and 30% had elevated 24 h urinary Ca or PO4 excretion. No patients with FGF23 abnormalities had urine abnormalities. 40% had low DXA Z-score (<-2) at spine or hip but there was no difference between control and antiviral treatment groups and the mean FRAX score was 2.33% for major osteoporotic fractures and 0.29% for hip fracture. Conclusion. Abnormalities in bone metabolism, particularly involving vitamin D insufficiency, in HBV-treated subjects were observed with a small increased likelihood in TDF treated patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Phosphates/blood , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Calcium/blood , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Fibroblast Growth Factors/blood , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Time Factors , Vitamin D Deficiency/chemically induced , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Biomarkers/blood , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Density/drug effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/blood , Fractures, Bone/chemically induced , Tenofovir/adverse effects , Guanine/adverse effects , Guanine/therapeutic use
4.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 50(3): e5796, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-839267

ABSTRACT

We aimed to investigate the influence of regulatory T cells including CD4+CD25+, CD8+CD28- and hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype on sustained virological response and tolerance of nucleoside drugs. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled. Lamivudine was administered to 84 patients. Entecavir was administered to the other 53 patients. Before treatment, biochemical tests, HBV DNA load, HBV serum level, HBV genotype, PB CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+CD25+/CD3+, and CD8+CD28-/CD3+ frequencies were measured. Based on HBV DNA loads after 4 weeks of therapy, patients were divided into response group and suboptimal response group. The lamivudine group received treatment continuously, and then patients were categorized into non-resistance group and resistance group. Compared with the suboptimal response and resistance groups for lamivudine, CD4+CD25+/CD3+ levels were higher in the response and non-resistance groups (t=4.372, P=0.046; t=7.262, P=0.017). In the non-resistance group, CD8+CD28-/CD3+ frequency was lower than in the resistance group (t=5.527, P=0.037). Virus load and hepatitis B E antigen (HBeAg)-positive rate were significantly lower than in the response and resistance group (t=2.164, P=0.038; X2=4.239, P=0.040; t=2.015, P=0.044; X2=16.2, P=0.000). Incidence of drug resistance was high in patients with virogene type C. For the virological response to entecavir, CD8+CD28-/CD3+ level was significantly lower than that of the suboptimal response group (t=6.283, P=0.036). Response and suboptimal response groups were compared in CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+CD25+/CD3+ and virus genotype, and differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Baseline regulatory T cells including CD4+CD25+/CD3+ and CD8+CD28-/CD3+ frequencies have a relationship with the incidence of rapid virological response and the resistance to nucleoside drugs. Patients with HBV genotype C receiving lamivudine more often underwent drug resistance. Antiviral efficacy and the resistance to lamivudine were closely correlated with baseline factors; the same cannot be found for entecavir.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Nucleosides/therapeutic use , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory , Drug Resistance , Genotype , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B virus/drug effects , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Sustained Virologic Response , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Time Factors
5.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 111(4): 252-257, Apr. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-778998

ABSTRACT

There are about 350 million hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers worldwide and chronic HBV is considered a major public health problem. The objective of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of the nucleos(t)ide analogues tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of chronic HBV. A cross-sectional study was carried out from March-December 2013, including all patients with chronic HBV, over 18 years of age, undergoing therapy through the public health system in southern Brazil. Only the data relating to the first treatments performed with TDF or ETV were considered. Retreatment, co-infection, transplanted or immunosuppressed patients were excluded. Six hundred and forty patients were evaluated, of which 336 (52.5%) received TDF and 165 (25.8%) ETV. The other 139 (21.7%) used various combinations of nucleos(t)ide analogues and were excluded. The negativation of viral load was observed in 87.3% and 78.8% and the negativation of hepatitis B e antigen was achieved in 79% and 72% of those treated with ETV or TDF, respectively. Negativation of hepatitis B surface antigen was not observed. There was no occurrence of adverse effects. This is a real-life study demonstrating that long-term treatment with ETV and TDF is both safe and effective.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Viral , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B e Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Public Health , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load
7.
Rev. saúde pública ; 47(4): 769-780, ago. 2013. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-695415

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO Avaliar o custo-efetividade de diferentes tratamentos medicamentosos para hepatite B crônica entre pacientes adultos. MÉTODOS Utilizando modelo de Markov, construiu-se coorte hipotética de 40 anos para pacientes HBeAg-positivo ou HBeAg-negativo. Foram comparados os usos de adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir e lamivudina (com terapia de resgate em caso de resistência viral) para tratamento de pacientes adultos com hepatite B crônica, virgens de tratamento, com elevados níveis de alanina aminotransferase, sem evidência de cirrose e sem coinfecção por HIV. Valores para custo e efeito foram obtidos da literatura. A medida do efeito foi expressa em anos de vida ganhos (AVG). Taxa de desconto de 5% foi aplicada. Análise de sensibilidade univariada foi conduzida para avaliar incertezas do modelo. RESULTADOS O tratamento inicial com entecavir ou tenofovir apresentou melhores resultados clínicos. As menores razões custo-efetividade foram de entecavir para pacientes HBeAg-positivo (R$ 4.010,84/AVG) e lamivudina para pacientes HBeAg-negativo (R$ 6.205,08/AVG). Para pacientes HBeAg-negativo, a razão custo-efetividade incremental de entecavir (R$ 14.101,05/AVG) está abaixo do limiar recomendado pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. Análise de sensibilidade mostrou que variação nos custos dos medicamentos pode tornar tenofovir alternativa custo-efetiva tanto para pacientes HBeAg-positivo quanto para HBeAg-negativo. CONCLUSÕES Entecavir é alternativa recomendada para iniciar o tratamento de pacientes com hepatite B crônica no Brasil. Contudo, se houver redução no custo de tenofovir, esta pode se tornar alternativa mais custo-efetiva. .


OBJETIVO Evaluar el costo-efectividad de diferentes tratamientos medicamentosos para hepatitis B crónica entre pacientes adultos. MÉTODOS Utilizando el modelo de Markov, se construyó cohorte hipotética de 40 años para pacientes HBeAg-positivo o HBeAg-negativo. Se compararon los usos de adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir y lamivudina (con terapia de rescate en caso de resistencia viral) para tratamiento de pacientes adultos con hepatitis B crónica, vírgenes de tratamiento, con elevados niveles de alanina aminotransferasa, sin evidencia de cirrosis y sin coinfección por VIH. Valores para costo y efecto fueron obtenidos de la literatura y efecto en años de vida ganados (AVG). Tasa de descuento de 5% fue aplicada. Análisis de sensibilidad univariado fue conducido para evaluar incertidumbres del modelo. RESULTADOS El tratamiento inicial con entecavir o tenofovir presentó mejores resultados clínicos. Los menores cocientes costo-efectividad fueron de entecavir para pacientes HBeAg-positivo (R.010,84/AVG) y lamivudina para pacientes HBeAg-negativo (R.205,08/AVG).Para pacientes HBeAg-negativo, el cociente costo-efectividad incrementado de entecavir (R.101,05/AVG) está por debajo del límite recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. El análisis de sensibilidad mostró que la variación en los costos de los medicamentos puede tornar tenofovir una alternativa costo-efectiva tanto para pacientes HBeAg-positivo como para los HBeAg-negativo. CONCLUSIONES Entecavir es una alternativa recomendada para iniciar el tratamiento de pacientes con hepatitis B crónica en Brasil. Sin embargo, al haber reducción en el costo de tenofovir, éste puede convertirse en una alternativa más costo-efectiva. .


OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies for chronic hepatitis B in adult patients. METHODS Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of 40 years for HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative patients was constructed. Adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir and lamivudine (with rescue therapy in cases of viral resistance) were compared for treating adult patients with chronic hepatitis B undergoing treatment for the first time, with high levels of alanine aminotransferase, no evidence of cirrhosis and without HIV co-infection. Values for cost and effect were obtained from the literature, and expressed in effect on life years (LY). A discount rate of 5% was applied. Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess model uncertainties. RESULTS Initial treatment with entecavir or tenofovir showed better clinical outcomes. The lowest cost-effectiveness ratio was for entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients (R$ 4,010.84/LY) and lamivudine for HBeAg-negative patients (R$ 6,205.08/LY). For HBeAg-negative patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of entecavir (R$ 14,101.05/LY) is below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis showed that variation in the cost of drugs may make tenofovir a cost-effective alternative for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS Entecavir is the recommended alternative to start treating patients with chronic hepatitis B in Brazil. However, if there is a reduction in the cost of tenofovir, it can become a cost-effective alternative. .


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Antiviral Agents/economics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/economics , Adenine/therapeutic use , Analysis of Variance , Antiviral Agents/classification , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/economics , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B virus , Lamivudine/economics , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Markov Chains , Organophosphonates/economics , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
8.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 17(4): 418-426, July-Aug. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-683128

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility study of adefovir, entecavir, interferon alpha, pegylated interferon alpha, lamivudine and tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B in the context of Brazilian Public Health Care System. A systematic review was carried out for efficacy and safety. Another review was performed to collect utility data and transition probabilities between health states. A Markov model was developed in a time horizon of 40 years with annual cycles for three groups of: HBeAg positive, HBeAg negative, and all patients. These strategies were compared to a fourth group that received no treatment. Discount rates of 5% were applied and sensitivity analyses were performed. Tenofovir offered the best cost-utility ratio for the three evaluated models: U$397, U$385 and U$384 (per QALY, respectively, for HBeAg positive, negative, and all patients). All other strategies were completely dominated because they showed higher costs and lower effectiveness than tenofovir. The sequence of cost-utility in the three models was: tenofovir, entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, pegylated interferon alpha, and interferon alpha. In the sensitivity analysis, adefovir showed lower cost-utility than telbivudine in some situations. The study has some limitations, primarily related to the creation of scenarios and modeling. In this study, tenofovir presented the best cost-utility ratio. The results obtained in this study will be valuable in decision-making and in the review of the clinical protocol, mainly involving the allocation of available resources for health care.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Antiviral Agents/economics , Hepatitis B e Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/economics , Adenine/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Therapy, Combination/economics , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/economics , Guanine/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/economics , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Lamivudine/economics , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Markov Chains , Organophosphonates/economics , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols/economics , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/economics , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use
9.
Rev. saúde pública ; 46(6): 942-949, Dez. 2012. ilus, graf, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-667604

ABSTRACT

.


OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of drug alternatives with rescue therapy in case of relapse due to viral resistance for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: Hypothetical cohort of patients with CHB, HBeAg-negative, without clinical or histological evidence of cirrhosis, detectable HBV DNA, histological diagnosis of the disease, positive serum HBsAg for longer than six months, high levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (twice as high as the upper limit of normality) and mean age of 40 years. A Markov model was developed for chronic hepatitis B (HBeAg- negative) with a 40-year time horizon. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5%. Annual rates of disease progression, costs due to complications and the efficacy of medicines were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated uncertainties. RESULTS: Initiation of treatments with entecavir resulted in an increase of 0.35 discounted life-years gained compared to lamivudine. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was R$16,416.08 per life-years gained. In the sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was more sensitive to variation in the probability of transition from chronic hepatitis B to compensated cirrhosis, discount rate and medicine prices (± 10%). In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the acceptability curve showed that beginning treatment with entecavir was the most cost-effective alternative in comparison with the use of lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of entecavir is economically attractive as part of early treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B without HIV co-infection.


.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antiviral Agents/economics , Drug Resistance, Viral , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/economics , Adenine/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/economics , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/economics , Markov Chains , Models, Theoretical , Organophosphonates/economics , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
10.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 32(4): 400-404, oct.-dic. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-692409

ABSTRACT

Paciente varón de 45 años natural de Lima, casado con antecedentes de , múltiples parejas sexuales y operado de fimosis, que debuta con eritema nodoso y diagnosticado de hepatitis B crónica en Agosto del 2008, en controles por consultorio se realiza diagnóstico de cirrosis hepática child A y hepatocarcinoma. Inicia tratamiento para la hepatitis B con Entecavir 0,5mg y luego se realiza hepatectomía del segmento V, En Febrero 2009 en controles de imágenes se evidencia recidiva de hepatocarcinoma en el segmento VI (lesión de 14mm) con AFP de 68 ng/dl, se realiza etanolización, con evolución final favorable. Durante el seguimiento no se observa evidencia de recidiva de HCC, continua con Entecavir 0,5 mg /d y en abril 2010, luego de 72 semanas de tratamiento con adecuada adherencia al tratamiento presenta rebrote virológico (carga viral positiva de 646 UI/dl), y se decide agregar a la terapia Tenofovir. Actualmente paciente con buena evolución con última carga viral de Abril del 2012 negativa recibiendo terapia doble para VHB. Reportamos el caso por ser uno de los primeros en nuestro país de resistencia probable a Entecavir y donde se pone de manifiesto la necesidad de examenes complementarios que confirmen dicha sospecha.


A 45 year- old - married man, with several sexual partners, initiated symptoms with nodosum erythema and in August 2008, is diagnosed of chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV). Later he was diagnosed of Child A cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma. He began HBV treatment with Entecavir 0,5 mg; then he underwent a V segment hepatectomy. In February 2009 he presented a relapse with a tumor of 14 mm on VI segment with AFP values of 68 ng/dl, so he underwent an ethanolization with good evolution. During the follow up, he has not presented evidence of relapse of hepatocarcinoma and continued with Entecavir 0,5 mg/d. In April 2010, after 72 weeks of therapy with good compliance, the patient presented a virological breakthrough (viral load 646 UI/dl) and Tenofovir was added to his therapy. Nowadays the patient is receiving double therapy for HBV and his last viral load, April 2012, was negative. This could be the first case in our country of a probable resistance to Entecavir; complementary tests are needed in order to rule out this suspicion.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Viral , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology
11.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 16(4): 366-372, July-Aug. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-645427

ABSTRACT

The results of several new clinical trials that compared the effectiveness of entecavir (ETV) treatment with that of adefovir (ADV) treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were published in recent years. However, the numbers of patients included in these clinical trials were too small to draw a clear conclusion as to whether ETV is more effective than ADV. Therefore, a new meta-analysis was needed to compare ETV with ADV for the treatment of CHB. A search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), MEDLINE, the Science Citation Index, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wanfang Database for relevant studies published between 1966 and 2010 was performed. Trials comparing the use of ETV and ADV for the treatment of CHB were assessed. Of the 2,358 studies screened, 13 randomized controlled clinical trials comprising 1,230 patients (ETV therapy, 621; ADV therapy, 609) were analyzed. The serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA clearance rate obtained in patients treated with ETV was significantly higher than that in patients treated with ADV at the 24th and 48th weeks of treatment (24 weeks: 59.6% vs. 31.8%, relative risk [RR], 1.82, 95% CI: 1.49-2.23; 48 weeks: 78.3% vs. 50.4%, RR, 1.61, 95% CI: 1.32-1.96). The serum HBeAg clearance rate, the HBeAg seroconversion rate, and the ALT normalization rate obtained for patients treated with ETV were also higher than the corresponding values for patients treated with ADV at the 48th week of treatment. The safety profiles were similar between patients treated with ETV and those treated with ADV. The evidence reviewed in this meta-analysis suggests that patients with hepatitis B have a greater likelihood of achieving a viral response and a biomedical response when treated with ETV than when treated with ADV.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Adenine/therapeutic use , Guanine/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
12.
J. bras. pneumol ; 37(4): 556-559, jul.-ago. 2011. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-597207

ABSTRACT

Relatamos o caso de um paciente do sexo masculino de 58 anos de idade, que foi encaminhado para a consulta de oncologia por apresentar uma massa epigástrica de crescimento rápido em três meses de evolução. A investigação diagnóstica revelou tratar-se de um adenocarcinoma pulmonar metastático estádio IV. Recebeu cinco ciclos de cisplatina e gemcitabina como tratamento de primeira linha, que foi interrompido devido a efeitos adversos. Houve estabilidade da doença pulmonar e progressão cutânea. Recebeu pemetrexed como tratamento de segunda linha e radioterapia externa concomitante, com boa tolerância e regressão completa da massa epigástrica. Entretanto, o paciente faleceu três meses após o tratamento. Destacamos aqui importância da multidisciplinaridade e do seu papel na individualização do tratamento.


We report the case of a 58-year-old male patient who was referred for oncology consultation due to an epigastric mass that had been growing rapidly for three months. Diagnostic investigation revealed that the mass was a metastasis of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. The patient received five cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine as a first-line treatment, which was interrupted due to major adverse events. Although the pulmonary disease stabilized, the cutaneous disease progressed. The patient then received pemetrexed as a second-line chemotherapy, together with concurrent external radiotherapy, which was well tolerated. There was complete remission of the epigastric mass. However, the patient died three months after the treatment. Here, we emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and of its role in individualizing the treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/secondary , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Fatal Outcome , Glutamates/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Staging , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy
13.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 43(4): 440-451, jul.-ago. 2010. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-556013

ABSTRACT

INTRODUÇÃO: A hepatite crônica B é uma das doenças infecciosas mais frequentes no mundo e constitui um grave problema de saúde pública MÉTODOS: Para avaliar a eficácia dos análogos de núcleosídeo/nucletídeo utilizados no seu tratamento (adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir e telbivudina) foi conduzida uma revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados. Foram consultadas, dentre outras, as bases de dados PubMed e LILACS RESULTADOS: Foram selecionados 29 artigos entre os publicados de janeiro/1970 até dezembro/2009 CONCLUSÕES: Todos os análogos de núcleosídeo/nucletídeo apresentam eficácia superior ou similar à lamivudina. O entecavir pode ser indicado para o tratamento da hepatite B crônica como alternativa à lamivudina em pacientes HBeAg positivo e negativo virgens de tratamento, considerando seu baixo potencial de resistência viral. A adição de adefovir à lamivudina apresentou bons resultados em pacientes resistentes à lamivudina. O uso de entecavir e telbivudina nesses pacientes apresenta risco de resistência cruzada. Telbivudina é um dos mais recentes antivirais disponíveis, mas resistência antiviral já documentada representa limitação ao seu uso como opção terapêutica à lamivudina. Eventos adversos aos análogos de núcleosídeo/nucletídeo foram similares em características, gravidade e incidência quando comparados à lamivudina e placebo.


INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B is one of the most frequent infectious disease in the world and represents a serious problem of public health METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (adefovir, entecavir and telbivudine) used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The databases PubMed and LILACS were consulted, among others RESULTS: Twenty nine articles published between January/1970 to December/2009 were selected CONCLUSIONS: All nucleoside/nucleotide analogues demonstrate upper or similar efficacy to lamivudine. The entecavir can be appropriate for patients with chronic hepatitis B, HBeAg positive and negative treatment-naive as alternative to lamivudine, considering its low potential of viral resistance. The addition of adefovir to lamivudine presented good results in lamivudine resistant patients. The use of entecavir and telbivudine in those patients presents risk of crossed resistance. TBV is one of the most recent antivirals available, but antiviral resistance already documented represents limitation to its use as therapeutic option to LAM. Adverse events of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues were similar in characteristics, gravity and incidence when compared to the lamivudina and placebo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Nucleosides/therapeutic use , Phosphorous Acids , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Adenine/therapeutic use , Guanine/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
14.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 12(5): 368-373, Oct. 2008. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-505348

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis B virus infection is an important public-health issue. Chronic patients have a higher risk of death due to complications, which increases health-care expenses in. Cost-effectiveness analysis of entecavir (ETV) versus lamivudine (LVD) for treatment of chronic hepatitis B, in e antigen (AgHBe)-positive and negative patients, based on two phase 3, controlled and randomized studies. A decision analysis model was developed, using the following endpoints: cost per patient with undetectable viral load and cost per quality life year (QALY) gained. Risks for complications (compensated or decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma) were based on the cohort study REVEAL, published in 2006. The REVEAL parameters were applied to the results of the viral load levels obtained from the clinical assay data. The complication costs were based on a study of the disease cost conducted in Brazil, in 2005. The cost data were obtained predominantly from Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS - Brazilian public health system] payment tables and drug price lists. The utility data were obtained from literature and life expectancy information was based on IBGE data. The analysis perspective was that of SUS. A discount rate of 3 percent per year was used. For the horizon of time of 10 years, the ETV had an incremental cost of approximately two million Brazilian Reais (R$) compared to LVD. Reducing the number of complications, ETV treatment reduced costs by around 3 million, reducing final costs by 1 million, for AgHBe-positive patients. ETV also reduced the incremental cost per QALY gained. ETV was found to be the most cost-effective alternative for AgHBe-positive and negative patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antiviral Agents/economics , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Lamivudine/economics , Virus Replication/drug effects , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Guanine/economics , Guanine/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B virus/physiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/economics , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL